Jurisdictional dispute


This case before a federal court involved perceived conflicts between federal and state laws pertaining to certain transportation activities.


  • Analysis:
    • Reviewed case materials.
    • Analyzed opposition’s arguments, underlying assumptions, expert reports and exemplar company raw data.
    • Conducted independent analysis of major issues.
    • Revealed inconsistencies, double-counting and other errors in opposition reports.
    • Re-framed raw data in logical, easy-to-follow manner.
    • Refuted opposition’s contention regarding perceived damages.


  • Supported attorneys with powerful, fact-based analysis.
  • Demonstrated flaws in reports submitted by opposition experts.