Jurisdictional dispute

Challenge

This case before a federal court involved perceived conflicts between federal and state laws pertaining to certain transportation activities.

Approach

• Analysis:
  • Reviewed case materials.
  • Analyzed opposition’s arguments, underlying assumptions, expert reports and exemplar company raw data.
  • Conducted independent analysis of major issues.
  • Revealed inconsistencies, double-counting and other errors in opposition reports.
  • Re-framed raw data in logical, easy-to-follow manner.
  • Refuted opposition’s contention regarding perceived damages.

Results

• Supported attorneys with powerful, fact-based analysis.
• Demonstrated flaws in reports submitted by opposition experts.